Public
agentspacecoding / codeburn
Benchmark updated: 9/1/202630 Tasks
Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn
Languages
TypeScript78.8%Swift15.8%JavaScript2.1%CSS1.6%Rust0.9%HTML0.6%Other0.2%
Harness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |  Mini-SWE-agent | $5.37 | 19m57s |
Key Takeaways
- This single supplied run establishes no model or harness comparison.
Cost Analysis
Cost / Test vs. Accuracy
ACCURACYCOST
Lab:
Pinch or Ctrl/Cmd + scroll to zoom. Once zoomed, scroll or swipe with two fingers to pan, or drag to pan. Shift + drag draws a box to zoom into; turn on box zoom to draw one without Shift. Plus and minus keys zoom, arrow keys pan, 0 resets.
Average Token Use / Test
Token Usage
InputOutputReasoningCache readCache write
No token usage data available.
Cost is the clearest tradeoff in this comparison. Claude Sonnet 5 leads at 30.00% for $5.37 per test. No other model in this comparison is cheaper.
Latency Analysis
Latency vs. Accuracy
ACCURACYLATENCY
Lab:
Pinch or Ctrl/Cmd + scroll to zoom. Once zoomed, scroll or swipe with two fingers to pan, or drag to pan. Shift + drag draws a box to zoom into; turn on box zoom to draw one without Shift. Plus and minus keys zoom, arrow keys pan, 0 resets.
Average Response Time / Test
Response Time
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 is both the most accurate and fastest model in this comparison at 30.00% and 19m 57s.