Public

torvalds / linux

Benchmark updated: 8/15/202685 Tasks
Add models

Linux kernel source tree

Languages

C98%Assembly0.7%Rust0.4%Shell0.4%Python0.3%Makefile0.2%

Harness

1

Mini-SWE-agent
63 / 85

$1.09

5m09s

2

Mini-SWE-agent
58 / 85

$1.43

7m08s

3

Mini-SWE-agent
58 / 85

$2.79

8m02s

4

Mini-SWE-agent
56 / 85

$0.19

101.76s

5

Mini-SWE-agent
56 / 85

$1.43

5m16s

6

Mini-SWE-agent
55 / 85

$0.17

108.81s

7

Mini-SWE-agent
54 / 85

$0.78

3m36s

8

Mini-SWE-agent
54 / 85

$2.12

11m23s

9

Mini-SWE-agent
53 / 85

$0.04

2m49s

10

Mini-SWE-agent
53 / 85

$3.65

8m38s

11

Mini-SWE-agent
53 / 85

$0.34

4m52s

12

Mini-SWE-agent
48 / 85

$0.18

2m27s

13

Mini-SWE-agent
48 / 85

$0.64

2m43s

14

Mini-SWE-agent
48 / 85

$0.52

2m46s

15

Mini-SWE-agent
47 / 85

$0.32

8m44s

Cost Analysis

Cost / Test vs. Accuracy
ACCURACYCOST

Average Token Use / Test

Token Usage
InputOutputReasoningCache readCache write
Claude Sonnet 5
4.2M
Claude Opus 4.7
1.6M
Kimi K3
1.1M
GLM 5.2
1.1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1.0M
Claude Opus 4.8
937K
Claude Haiku 4.5 (Nonthinking)
918K
Claude Fable 5
882K
GPT-5.6 Sol
692K
GPT-5.6 Luna
687K
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26)
596K
GPT 5.5
591K
Grok 4.5
262K
GPT-5.6 Terra
233K

Cost is the clearest tradeoff in this comparison. GPT-5.6 Sol leads at 74.12% for $1.09 per test. GPT-5.6 Luna is the lower-cost option at 62.35% for $0.04 per test.

Latency Analysis

Latency vs. Accuracy
ACCURACYLATENCY

Average Response Time / Test

Response Time
Claude Sonnet 5
11m 23s
GLM 5.2
8m 44s
Kimi K3
8m 38s
Claude Fable 5
8m 2s
Claude Opus 4.8
7m 8s
Claude Opus 4.7
5m 16s
GPT-5.6 Sol
5m 9s
Muse Spark 1.2
4m 52s
GPT 5.5
3m 36s
GPT-5.6 Luna
2m 49s
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26)
2m 46s
Gemini 3.5 Flash
2m 43s
Claude Haiku 4.5 (Nonthinking)
2m 27s
Grok 4.5
1m 49s
GPT-5.6 Terra
1m 42s

Latency separates several models with similarly strong scores. GPT-5.6 Sol leads at 74.12%, while GPT-5.6 Terra is fastest at 1m 42s with 65.88% accuracy.